A Smartwatch Can’t Hold a Memory#
The disposability problem#
A smartwatch has a shelf life measured in operating system updates. Nobody is passing one to their children.
That’s not a complaint about the technology, which does its job well. It’s a category observation — it’s a computer, and computers get replaced. Once you see it that way, wearing one as jewellery starts to feel like the wrong use of your wrist.
The alternative isn’t nostalgia. It’s that a mechanical or quartz watch survives long enough to accumulate the places you wore it.
The three technologies, briefly#
- Quartz digital. A quartz crystal vibrating 32,768 times a second, read by a circuit. Extremely accurate — seconds per month — and with so few parts it’s more sensible to replace than repair.
- Quartz analog. Same underlying tech, traditional hands, ticking once per second.
- Mechanical. No battery, no electronics — gears and springs, ticking several times a second so the hand sweeps smoothly. Either automatic, wound by the motion of your arm, or hand-wound every day or two, which plenty of expensive watches still are.
Knowing which you’re buying matters more than the brand, because it determines what owning it will be like.
Where to start cheaply#
- Casio F91W, about $22. Roughly seven years on a battery, and the closest thing watches have to a Toyota Corolla.
- Casio A168 — the same thing with a metal bracelet and a backlight that glows across the whole face.
- Casio Royale, with multiple time zones, which genuinely matters if you fly — no manual adjusting on landing — plus 100m water resistance and a decade of battery.
- G-Shock, if durability is the point. One survived being dropped from a helicopter.
- Citizen Eco-Drive, charged by light, so the battery question never comes up. One sat in a dark closed box and started ticking the moment it saw daylight.
- Seiko 5, an automatic on the NH35 movement — a reasonable and cheap entry into mechanical watches.
- MoonSwatch, if you want something with a story attached to it before you’ve made one.
The actual argument#
The list of watches he owns is really a list of events.
A Timex Expedition bought twenty years ago at a scout camp — the most expensive thing he bought there — used for rope climbing and swimming, and now earmarked for a child who takes up the outdoors. An Invicta given by his parents at graduation, which is what got him into mechanical watches, and which he replaced after landing a teaching job. A G-Shock bought on a boss’s advice, where every scratch recalls a specific shoot.
None of that works with a device you’ll bin in four years. The object has to outlast the occasion for the occasion to attach to it.
One caveat#
There’s a warning attached and it’s a fair one: this gets addictive. The distance between “a cheap Casio so I stop looking at notifications” and a growing collection is shorter than it looks.
The useful version stops early. One good watch that isn’t connected to anything solves the original problem completely.
A few small things to try#
- Take the smartwatch off outside of workouts for a week and see what you miss
- Buy a Casio F91W for about the cost of a takeaway and wear it
- Work out which of the three technologies actually suits how you live
- Notice which watch you’d want to still have in thirty years